Friday, July 9, 2010
Coming Back
After taking a break from this blog, I am going to try and restart writing and exploring some concepts regarding obesity trends. If you have any ideas that I should explore, let me know and I will look into it.
Monday, April 19, 2010
A Final Word
I hope you enjoyed reading through the blog and had a chance to think about the broad pictures of some of the social determinants that impact obesity and the associated comorbid conditions. The reason I chose to do this assignment in blog format was to explore a different way of expressing and synthesizing information that is found on the health topics that we are researching. Social media allows health care professionals to access new forms of intervention and health promotion strategies that have not been allowed conventionally. It also gave me an opportunity to compare the things that I was reading about in academic journals with how these things play out in my own environment. Finally, use of this format gives me the freedom to synthesize different sources of information, from news articles, Youtube, other blogs etc.(things the general public uses and is familiar with) into this assignment.
Please feel free to give feedback and comments on what you think about the issues and arguments I have included here.
Please feel free to give feedback and comments on what you think about the issues and arguments I have included here.
Why This Matters
Traditional approaches of combating obesity have often consisted of health care professionals encouraging individuals to eat less and exercise. This has led to a multi-billion industry revolving around dieting and intense exercise routines that are difficult for people to incorporate into their daily lives. Meanwhile, despite these efforts, the rates of obesity have continued to increase.
The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada released a position statement calling for different levels of governments, policy makers, and Canadians to get involved in creating healthier environments. For instance, strategies to change the built environment to promote walking impact our health have been advocated for. The article describes that the risk of obesity "can decline by 4.8% for each additional kilometre walked per day".
The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada released a position statement calling for different levels of governments, policy makers, and Canadians to get involved in creating healthier environments. For instance, strategies to change the built environment to promote walking impact our health have been advocated for. The article describes that the risk of obesity "can decline by 4.8% for each additional kilometre walked per day".
New York City has taken some of the research on the built environment and the importance of involving non-traditional stakeholders to heart, and has developed strategies to promote a healthier city through. The New York Fit City project couples the health department with non profits, community groups, and academic institutions. Over the short span the project has been running, they have documented significant improvements in dietary patterns and physical activity. The initiatives range from opening community gardens to changing building designs and having stair prompts beside elevators. Such imaginative strategies are inspiring and serve as good models for seeing the research being translated into action to improve health for people.
Putting it all together
From all the different posts that I have included in this blog, it is clear that obesity and the associated comorbid conditions is a complicated problem with a very complex etiology. The following chart was presented to our class in a lecture from Dr. Arya Sharma, that captures the complexity of the situation quite well:
I could go on describing each one of these factors and how they impact obesity. The big picture to consider is the same one that we hear numerous times regarding many different conditions: "Genetics loads the gun, and environment pulls the trigger." The tremendous rise in obesity and associated comorbidities begs health care providers, policymakers, and the general society to consider interventions that address the issue in a broad manner, rather than blaming the individual and reducing the debate to simply being a matter of over eating and energy balance.
Research indicates that broad issues such as socioeconomic status, the built environment, and changes in dietary patterns have all contributed to the rising prevalence of obesity. In addition, these factors do not impact obesity in isolation. They overlap and influence each other, and greater understanding of these relationships is required to enhance our ability to create meaningful interventions. Considering obesity from a multi-factorial model also allows us to use a bigger toolkit aiding with prevention and management strategies. For instance, considering addiction to food as a cause of obesity among some people, and use of strategies used among mental health and addiction issues may be worthwhile to consider.
It is also important to remember that health care workers and policymakers will need to integrate information and strategies from different professions to make future interventions more successful. We need to be able to draw from diverse backgrounds ranging from architects and civil engineers involved in building design and urban planning to nutritionists and physicians to tackle the deficits in health that are created by our environment.
I could go on describing each one of these factors and how they impact obesity. The big picture to consider is the same one that we hear numerous times regarding many different conditions: "Genetics loads the gun, and environment pulls the trigger." The tremendous rise in obesity and associated comorbidities begs health care providers, policymakers, and the general society to consider interventions that address the issue in a broad manner, rather than blaming the individual and reducing the debate to simply being a matter of over eating and energy balance.
Research indicates that broad issues such as socioeconomic status, the built environment, and changes in dietary patterns have all contributed to the rising prevalence of obesity. In addition, these factors do not impact obesity in isolation. They overlap and influence each other, and greater understanding of these relationships is required to enhance our ability to create meaningful interventions. Considering obesity from a multi-factorial model also allows us to use a bigger toolkit aiding with prevention and management strategies. For instance, considering addiction to food as a cause of obesity among some people, and use of strategies used among mental health and addiction issues may be worthwhile to consider.
It is also important to remember that health care workers and policymakers will need to integrate information and strategies from different professions to make future interventions more successful. We need to be able to draw from diverse backgrounds ranging from architects and civil engineers involved in building design and urban planning to nutritionists and physicians to tackle the deficits in health that are created by our environment.
And the list goes on...
It's Addictive:
Broadening the search for the etiology of the obesity epidemic has helped Taylor and others develop new approaches and strategies. Although this is not true for the general population, for numerous individuals struggling with obesity, use of behavioral therapy, along with evidence and techniques that have been learned in dealing with other addictions can be applied in the treatment model for obesity.
H/t to Rohan Parab for pointing this out to me. Here is a movie coming up "Lbs" that follows two friends, one dealing with food addiction and another with crack.
Is it the gym teachers fault?
Head to Head: Chips vs. Carrots?
A review on the role of energy density and food costs by Adam Drewnowski and SE Specter, reveals that there is an established relationship between the low cost of calorie-rich foods. People are getting higher percentage of their calories from energy dense foods (high in fat and sugar). Meanwhile the volume of food we eat has remained about consistent. Moreover, energy dense food are more palatable and influence preference of dietary tastes.

Over the past few decades, the cost of energy-dense foods has become very low. For instance, the energy cost of potato chips was about 20cents/MJ(1200kcal/$) while fresh carrots were about 95 cents/MJ(250kcal/$). Energy dense foods have been increasing in the mainstream diet readily over the past few decasdes, and cost for these foods has increased much slower than it has for healthier options of fruits and vegetables. Diets which include a lot of these energy dense, unhealthy options have been linked with higher risks of developing type 2 diabetes and obesity.
The review also revealed that income affects the quality of foods people eat, with higher SES groups having better quality diets. Food costs were found to be an issue for low income families as they spend a higher percentage of their disposable income on food.
This review demonstrates that there are broad factors at play when explaining the rise of the obesity epidemic. The study reveals that cost of food, access to income, how our palate and biopsychological dietary patterns develop based on the energy density of foods, confluence together to influence the rise in obesity!


Over the past few decades, the cost of energy-dense foods has become very low. For instance, the energy cost of potato chips was about 20cents/MJ(1200kcal/$) while fresh carrots were about 95 cents/MJ(250kcal/$). Energy dense foods have been increasing in the mainstream diet readily over the past few decasdes, and cost for these foods has increased much slower than it has for healthier options of fruits and vegetables. Diets which include a lot of these energy dense, unhealthy options have been linked with higher risks of developing type 2 diabetes and obesity.
The review also revealed that income affects the quality of foods people eat, with higher SES groups having better quality diets. Food costs were found to be an issue for low income families as they spend a higher percentage of their disposable income on food.
This review demonstrates that there are broad factors at play when explaining the rise of the obesity epidemic. The study reveals that cost of food, access to income, how our palate and biopsychological dietary patterns develop based on the energy density of foods, confluence together to influence the rise in obesity!
Does Sobeys Urban Fresh Change the Way You Eat?
The last post about how supermarkets impact our dietary trends got me thinking of how our own community measures up. Although I don't want to promote a specific brand of grocery stores, I think the way that Sobeys has integrated Urban Fresh Markets in settings which are filled with convenience stores, fast food outlets, and restaurants provides a healthier and convenient option for people to access healthier alternatives. There are two of these stores, one on Jasper Ave, and the other near University of Alberta. Although I am unsure of how cost effective is to shop at these stores, I think it's a good step in integrating supermarkets and healthy food options into day to day food outlets.I am curious to see if people living or working near the U of A have noticed any changes in their dietary trends since the opening of the place a couple years ago?
Creating capacity for healthy foods in our community is an important step in how people choose their diets. Adding readily accessible foods, especially in disadvantaged communities has been succesful in many different communities such as in California, and perhaps should be tried as a strategy to reduce the risk of obesity in low SES communities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

